You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I already sent you a note about the duplicate function that changes the modified date.
You replied that it the way you wanted ....
BUT ....
Just want to give you another point of view. I discussed that with my colleague and we both agree that "duplicate" should take a copy of the file changing the name - that's all.
If you go to "finder" on a Mac, that the way it works.
It's very confusing and hard to work with this behavior.
For example, when I want to put a new version of my php in production, I always duplicate the original which changes the modified date. But it's not true, right ?
I suggest to add a preference where we have the choice to keep or not the modified date when using "duplicate".
Thank you,
Maryse
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I already sent you a note about the duplicate function that changes the modified date.
You replied that it the way you wanted ....
BUT ....
Just want to give you another point of view. I discussed that with my colleague and we both agree that "duplicate" should take a copy of the file changing the name - that's all.
If you go to "finder" on a Mac, that the way it works.
It's very confusing and hard to work with this behavior.
For example, when I want to put a new version of my php in production, I always duplicate the original which changes the modified date. But it's not true, right ?
I suggest to add a preference where we have the choice to keep or not the modified date when using "duplicate".
Thank you,
Maryse
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: