Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

cyberduck as a replacement for rsync #1234

Closed
cyberduck opened this issue Aug 28, 2007 · 3 comments
Closed

cyberduck as a replacement for rsync #1234

cyberduck opened this issue Aug 28, 2007 · 3 comments
Assignees
@dkocher
Labels
core duplicate enhancement

Comments

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator

d3e9b47 created the issue

It would be really nice if you could login to two remote sites at once, and use Cyberduck to copy one entire site to the other. Actual mirroring/synchronization would be even nicer but just a basic copy from one remote site to another would be fantastic.

There isn't a good command-line sftp tool for this, you have to set up rsync or similar tools, which have drawback for regular users to try and build/implement.
Trying to show someone how rsync or other tools for this work is what prompted this feature request.
@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dkocher commented

Similar to #1177.

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

d3e9b47 commented

Well, 1177 asks for the existing tool file/sync-- local machine to server.

Is there a way to file/sync between two remote servers already in place?

Perhaps the summary/feature request should best be: have concurrent open connections with 2 remote servers.

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cyberduck commented Dec 6, 2007 •
edited

@dkocher commented

Yes, there is both #11971 and #1041.

@iterate-ch iterate-ch locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 26, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@dkocher dkocher

Labels
core duplicate enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@dkocher @cyberduck