Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

uploads start from scratch rather than continuing - using same server as before #3006

Closed
cyberduck opened this issue Feb 19, 2009 · 2 comments
Closed

uploads start from scratch rather than continuing - using same server as before #3006

cyberduck opened this issue Feb 19, 2009 · 2 comments
Assignees
@dkocher
Labels
bug core duplicate

Comments

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator

1d3bf4f created the issue

Hello, I noticed recently that when I restart uploads that have stopped, that they need to reload the entire file again rather than just finish uploading the rest of the file. I use 1and1.com as a hosting company and this feature did used to work before on the same site. Any suggestions? Thank you.
@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

1d3bf4f commented

Just some additional information:
What happens when it detects there is a file by the same name is that it 'prompts' me to choose an action. The choices are 'overwrite', 'rename' or 'skip'.
I read on another ticket that someone else experienced this issue and that your suggestion was the server wasn't configured to support it. Do you think this is the case? As I said I have a 1and1.com shared linux/unix server business hosting. Would you know if they support 'resuming file transfers' or is there a way for me to modify this? Thanks.

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dkocher commented

Duplicate for #2440.

@iterate-ch iterate-ch locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 26, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@dkocher dkocher

Labels
bug core duplicate
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@dkocher @cyberduck