Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase Mosso/Rackspace Cloud File limit beyond 10,000 #3950

Closed
cyberduck opened this issue Nov 24, 2009 · 2 comments
Closed

Increase Mosso/Rackspace Cloud File limit beyond 10,000 #3950

cyberduck opened this issue Nov 24, 2009 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator

0101100 created the issue

I have a container with 12,000 files in it. Currently Cyberduck only displays 10,000 files, cutting off the container.

There is no way to set the marker or number of files to view higher than the current 10,000 files which would be a great feature to have.

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dkocher commented

From the documentation:

The system will return a maximum of 10,000 Object names per request. To retrieve subsequent Object names, another request must be made with a ‘marker’ parameter. The marker indicates where the last list left off and the system will return Object names greater than this marker, up to 10,000 again. Note that the ‘marker’ value should be URL encoded prior to sending the HTTP request.
If 10,000 is larger than desired, a ‘limit’ parameter may be given.
If the number of Object names returned equals the limit given (or 10,000 if no limit is given), it can be assumed there are more Object names to be listed. If the container name list is exactly divisible by the limit, the last request will simply have no content.

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dkocher commented

In 0a0c3dc.

@iterate-ch iterate-ch locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 26, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants