Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Large File segments not deleted when main manifest is removed #7679

Closed
cyberduck opened this issue Dec 13, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

Large File segments not deleted when main manifest is removed #7679

cyberduck opened this issue Dec 13, 2013 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug fixed low priority openstack OpenStack Swift Protocol Implementation
Milestone

Comments

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator

e2f2ab4 created the issue

One of our customer ran into an issue when using Cyberduck to upload some large (>10G) files. They found that their object store usage did not go down after removing 300G of files and this was a concern for them as they are charged based on usage. They had deleted the SLO manifest files which appear to be the large files themselves.

After some frustration and a support call to ourselves, they resolved the situation by manually removing the segments , using the following process:
(1) Select menu item: 'View' -> 'Show Hidden Folders'

(2) Expand .file-segements

(3) Carefully delete the psuedo-folder named after large file wish to remove.

(4) Repeat 3 for any other large files that you need to remove.

I understand this is a known issue has been discussed with the Openstack large file code contributor. Logging this issue to make sure it has visibility and hopefully to help others who run into this.

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dkocher commented

In e585631.

@iterate-ch iterate-ch locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 26, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug fixed low priority openstack OpenStack Swift Protocol Implementation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants