Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

UDP Protocol Support #8128

Closed
cyberduck opened this issue Jul 29, 2014 · 8 comments
Closed

UDP Protocol Support #8128

cyberduck opened this issue Jul 29, 2014 · 8 comments
Assignees
@dkocher
Labels
core enhancement fixed low priority
Milestone
5.0

Comments

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator

1ca23b6 created the issue

Hi,

Just wanted to request the ability to use tsunami-udp as a data transfer method. If you're unfamiliar, it's an ultra fast way of sending (generally huge) datasets.

Some background links for information:

Thanks much and realize this may be a bit too esoteric but would be fantastic to have a GUI for Tsunami!
@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dkocher commented

Unless there is an implementation in Java it is very unlikely we will implement this.

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dkocher commented

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

1ca23b6 commented

I hadn't seen that link before, thanks for sharing!

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dkocher commented

What is the rationale you would like to see Tsunami implemented and not UDT?

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

207b01a commented

I'd be quite happy for either. Any improvement on the protocols available to move larger and larger data into and out of the cloud would be appreciated! Again realizing that this may be out of scope for CyberDuck but appreciate the ongoing consideration!

Cheers,
Michael

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dkocher commented

Replying to [comment:6 michael bishop]:

I'd be quite happy for either. Any improvement on the protocols available to move larger and larger data into and out of the cloud would be appreciated! Again realizing that this may be out of scope for CyberDuck but appreciate the ongoing consideration!

Would the storage target be an Amazon S3 bucket? Can you possibly give some more insights in your setup and usage scenario?

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dkocher commented

Please write to [mailto:feedback@cyberduck.io] if you are ready to alpha test a UDT transfer solution to Amazon S3 we are working on.

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dkocher commented

UDT proxy implementation in 62d5f5b.

@iterate-ch iterate-ch locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 26, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@dkocher dkocher

Labels
core enhancement fixed low priority
Projects
None yet
Milestone
5.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@dkocher @cyberduck